As i've stated time and time again revision was something I even had a trouble with in high school and college because I'm one of those individuals that procrastinates until the last minute, hops up on some form of caffeine and writes a 10 page research paper the night before its due. Thats just how I work. Its not brilliant, its not efficient, but its my usual process. However, I am beginning to see the art of revision, specifically with working with peers to gain insight and ideas that I often miss because I don't write that first draft.

I think Gilmore does a great job of giving us multiple options of revising that can be used in a classroom that may be subtle and decent enough for even the biggest moaners to deal with. I liked how he broke down some ways for groups to revise, as well as the individual. One activitiy that I liekd was the color marking exercise on page 100. I think this is a great way for students to revise because its a little more fun that the typical "underline" or "circling" approach and I think the concepts that Gilmore suggests such as syntax, rhetorical devices, and supporting evidence are good for students to try and pull out of their paper. I think this would help students recognize if they are doing these tasks, or if they are missing from their papers. I also like that this could easily turn in from an individual homework assignment to a partners activity, by allowing partners to look over or "corlor mark" one anothers paper. Overall, great activity I had never heard of this and think it sounds easy and practical to do in the everyday english classroom.

No comments:
Post a Comment